Legal Opinion
Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1603PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs in this case are construction workers who were employed by Defendant Tito Contractors. They allege that Tito intentionally and systematically denied them overtime wages and, at times, even refused to compensate them for non-overtime hours. In suing Tito and its president, Maximo Pierola, Plaintiffs assert a number of causes of action, including violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and the District of Columbia’s Wage Payment and Collection Law.
They now move for partial summary judgment on their claims…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wilson v. Hunam Inn, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Perez v. C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Akinsinde v. Not-For-Profit Hospital CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Tanya Mills v. Anadolu Agency NA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.