Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pegan v. American Surety Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Section 2991, Oregon Laws 1920 (§ 67-1101, Oregon Code 1930), upon which this prosecution is based, in so far as the same is applicable to this cause was enacted by the Legislative Assembly of 1903 as House Bill 213, and was entitled:

“An act to protect subcontractors, materialmen, and laborers furnishing material for doing work upon public buildings, structures, superstructures, or other public works. ’ ’

Section 1 thereof reads:

“Hereafter any person or persons, firm or corporation entering into a formal contract with the state of Oregon, or any municipality, county, or school district within…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Fitzgerald v. NealOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Hagquist v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Columbia County v. Consolidated Contract Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Oregon v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Unitec Corporation v. Beatty Safway Scaffold Co. Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Hines v. Ward Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  3. UNITEC Corp. v. Beatty Safway Scaffold Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Vigelius v. VigeliusWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Fogdall v. Lewis & Clark CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API