Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. Neal
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1924PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants, Neal & Gaskell, copartners, Security Construction Company and National Surety Company of New York, to recover the balance of an account for labor and material furnished by plaintiff to Neal & Gaskell.
The material facts are: The defendant Security Construction Company, entered into a contract with the state to construct a certain state highway in Baker County, Oregon, known as the Baker-Nelson section of the Old Oregon Trail, and executed an undertaking to the state with the defendant, National Surety Company of New York, as surety,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Hagquist v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Gardner v. First Escrow Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.