D & L SUPPLY v. Saurini
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
John Saurini appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of D & L Supply for money owed on an open account. Saurini asserts that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over him and that in fixing the amount owed D & L, the trial court relied on inadmissible hearsay evidence. We affirm.
The facts are straightforward. D & L, a Utah corporation, filed an action against Saurini for sums due D & L for goods sold to a Colorado corporation owned in part by Saurini. D & L alleged in its complaint that Saurini agreed to be personally liable for orders he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Themy v. Seagull Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Norton v. BlackhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Thornock v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Pentecost v. HarwardUtah Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Harline v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- GNS PARTNERSHIP v. FullmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Thayne v. Beneficial Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
- Gramlich v. MunseyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.