Legal Opinion

Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & Associates

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1982No. 17720PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This contest over the enforcement of a wage payment award by the Industrial Commission must now be dismissed as moot.

Respondent employed appellants as sales representatives. When a dispute over sales commissions arose, the two appellants obtained an award from the Industrial Commission against respondent for a total of $10,117.39. U.C.A., 1953, § 34-28-9 (Supp.1981). Appellants thereupon filed and docketed the Commission’s order in district court, garnished respondent’s bank account, and obtained payment in full. Shortly thereafter, on April 2, 1981, appellants filed a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Baird v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wickham v. FisherUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hoyle v. MonsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cache County v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re the Mental Condition of GilesUtah Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API