Legal Opinion

Techsnabexport, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 21, 1992No. Court 92-04-00248PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the rules of this court, Ukraine, the Republic of Tajikistan, Techsnabexport Ltd. (“TENEX”), 1 NUEXCO Trading Corporation (“NUEX-CO”) and Globe Nuclear Services and Supply GNSS (“GNSS”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), 2 request the court to grant a preliminary injunction enjoining the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”), from continuing its less than fair value (“LTFV”) investigation initiated in Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Uranium from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 56 Fed.Reg. 63,711…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  2. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  3. Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Dofasco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  5. JIA Farn Manufacturing Co. v. Secretary of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API