Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiff and defendant cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56. Plaintiff brought this action to contest a decision by the United States Customs Service (Customs) denying plaintiffs protest under 19 U.S.C. § 1515(a) (1988). Plaintiffs protest challenged the application of the automatic duty assessment provision contained in 19 C.F.R. § 353.53a(d)(l) (1988) to entries that plaintiff had made during the interim period between the publication of the preliminary and final less than fair value determinations in 64K Dynamic Random Access Memory Components (64K…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Omni U.S.A., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Sichuan Changhong Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Mukand International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.