Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Franklin
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiffs move for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1. In their motion plaintiffs seek judicial review of an order of the United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board denying as not in the public interest an application filed by the Port of Houston Authority for special purpose subzone status for plaintiffs’ petroleum refinery in Texas City, Texas. U.S. Foreign-Trade Zones Board Order No. 552, 56 Fed. Reg. 67,058 (1991). Plaintiffs base jurisdiction upon 28 U.S.C. § 1581® (1988). Defendants oppose the motion.
I. Background
The Port of Houston…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miami Free Zone Corporation, Inc. v. Foreign Trade Zones Board, United States Department of Commerce, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Friedman v. KantorUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Phibro Energy, Inc. v. BrownUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.