Legal Opinion
Amtruck Factors v. International Forest Products
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 27, 1990No. 24168-1-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.
International Forest Products, Inc. (IFP) appeals from the trial court's dismissal of its counterclaims and from the granting of a directed verdict in favor of Amtruck Factors, Inc. (Amtruck) on its claim for payment of unpaid invoices. Amtruck cross-appeals from the trial court's rejection of certain exhibits and from the court's allowance of a setoff to IFP.
I
IFP remanufactures lumber products and sells them wholesale. IFP's main office is in Chino, California, and it has a branch office in Vancouver, Washington. When IFP first opened its Vancouver branch office, William McCoy was hired as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Levy v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ross v. KirnerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Ross v. KirnerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Condor Enterprises, Inc. v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Smith v. Hansen, Hansen & Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- State v. ParadaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.