Legal Opinion

Wiseman v. Village Partners

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1978No. 15729PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Carl Wiseman filed a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits arising out of an injury, which he allegedly received in the course of his employment. After hearing testimony and examining a report made by a medical panel, an administrative law judge denied the award. The Industrial Commission affirmed this decision and denied a motion for review. We affirm. Unless otherwise indicated, statutory reference is to the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Utah Code Ann. Sec. 35-1-1 to Sec. 35-1-106 (1974 and Supp.1977).

The plaintiff apparently fell from a ladder while he was changing a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garner v. Hecla Mining CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Savage v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Clinger v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Painter Motor Co. v. OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lopez v. Kaiser Steel Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Prows v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API