Legal Opinion

Bruggeman v. South Dakota Chemical Dependency Counselor Certification Board

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1997No. 19662PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice

(on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] Circuit court dismissed appeal of a South Dakota Chemical Dependency Counselor Certification Board decision, ruling it was not an agency for purposes of an administrative appeal. We reverse and remand.

PACTS

[¶ 2.] James Bruggeman worked in Belle Fourehe as director of program development at the Addiction Family Resource Center, an alcohol prevention and treatment facility co-founded by Bruggeman and accredited by the Division of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (Division). Bruggeman was first certified as a chemical dependency counselor by the South Dakota Chemical Dependency…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. Spotted HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. Spotted HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cary v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fullmer v. State Farm Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Planned Parenthood, etc. v. Mike RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. DaugaardDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
  4. Calvello v. Yankton Sioux TribeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re the Medical License of SetliffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API