Legal Opinion

Fullmer v. State Farm Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1994No. 18404PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*862WUEST, Justice.

Appellant State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) brings this intermediate appeal, raising two issues. First, State Farm asks that we reverse the circuit court’s denial of attorney Curt Ireland’s (Ireland) motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant Joyce Ha-mond Beuning (Beuning). Second, State Farm asks that we remove Judge Grosshans as trial judge. We reverse the trial court on the first issue, but deny the request to remove Judge Grosshans.

FACTS

The basic facts underlying this action are thoroughly recounted in our opinion on an earlier appeal in this matter. See Fullmer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weaver v. BoortzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hawkins v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. SCHULL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. KoenigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bottum v. HerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fullmer v. State Farm Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gesinger v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Credit Collection Services, Inc. v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fanning v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. City of Watertown v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API