Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood, etc. v. Mike Rounds
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2008No. 05-3093PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
The Governor and Attorney General of South Dakota (“the State”), along with the intervenor crisis pregnancy centers, appeal the district court’s preliminary injunction preventing the 2005 version of South Dakota’s statute regulating informed consent to abortion from becoming effective. For the reasons discussed below, we vacate the preliminary injunction and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
I
In 2005, South Dakota enacted House Bill 1166 (“the Act”), amending the requirements for obtaining informed consent to an abortion as codified in S.D.C.L. §…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. LakeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Phelps-Roper v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Portz v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA, ND, SD v. RoundsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.