Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 30, 2011No. CIV. 11-4071-KESPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Dr. Carol Ball, move for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order that would enjoin defendants, Governor Dennis Daugaard, Attorney General Marty Jackley, Secretary Doneen Hollingsworth, and Board President Robert Ferrell, in their official capacities, from enforcing South Dakota House Bill 1217 (hereinafter “the Act”), which takes effect on July 1, 2011.
BACKGROUND
In 2005, the South Dakota Legislature amended SDCL 34-23A-10.1 to include various…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MKB Management Corp. v. BurdickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Temple v. Cleve Her Many HorsesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- Stuart v. HuffDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Little Rock Family Planning Services v. RutledgeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019
- MKB Management Corp. v. BurdickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.