Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Zlatnik

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1988No. G004469PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.

Donald Zlatnik contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction to extend his spousal support obligation beyond the termination date to which he and his former wife, Pamela Zlatnik, stipulated. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

I

Donald and Pamela Zlatnik dissolved their 14-year marriage in bifurcated proceedings in December 1978. A few months later, they entered into a written stipulation, drafted by Donald’s counsel, dividing their community property and awarding spousal support, child support and custody. 1 An order prepared pursuant to and contemporaneously with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. In Re Marriage of HuffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Foreman v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of IbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Diener v. McBeth (In Re Diener)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re Marriage of OustermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Dresser v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API