Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Ousterman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1996No. A070817PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court has jurisdiction to entertain a motion to modify spousal support brought after the last date the original order required support to be paid. We conclude the trial court does have jurisdiction to proceed.
Statement of the Case and Facts
The 25-year marriage of Roberta and Walter Ousterman, Jr., was dissolved on December 18, 1978, at which time respondent wife was awarded $3,500 per month as spousal support. Respondent unsuccessfully sought a modification of spousal support…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Maben v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of HuffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Marriage of ZlatnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Toni v. ToniNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Marriage of IbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Diener v. McBeth (In Re Diener)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Marriage of OstranderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Alerus Financial v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.