Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Hufford
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 1984No. Civ. 68749PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In this appeal we are called upon to determine whether judicial modification of spousal support is precluded by a boiler plate provision in a marital settlement agreement which merely provides that the agreement is entire and cannot be amended, altered or modified by the parties except by a writing signed by both parties. For the reasons to follow, we have concluded that such a provision does not fulfill the exception of Civil Code section 4811, subdivision (b), to exclude judicial modification.
Guy Hufford (husband) appeals from the denial of his order to show cause for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Knodel v. KnodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- In Re Marriage of HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- In Re Marriage of AylesworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of BenjaminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- In Re Marriage of OustermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- In Re Marriage of ZlatnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.