Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Foreman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1986No. D003191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Burnice R. Foreman appeals from an order denying her request to extend court-ordered spousal support payments beyond the termination date designated in the integrated property settlement between herself and her ex-husband, Marshall L. Foreman, Jr., and incorporated in the 1974 decree dissolving their 23-year marriage. We hold the trial court lacked jurisdiction to extend the spousal support beyond the date designated in the decree, and affirm.

I

When the Foremans separated after 23 years of marriage, they entered into a property settlement containing a spousal support provision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of FrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Fukuzaki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of ZlatnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. In Re Marriage of ChristieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. In Re Marriage of BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API