Foreman v. Foreman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Burnice R. Foreman appeals from an order denying her request to extend court-ordered spousal support payments beyond the termination date designated in the integrated property settlement between herself and her ex-husband, Marshall L. Foreman, Jr., and incorporated in the 1974 decree dissolving their 23-year marriage. We hold the trial court lacked jurisdiction to extend the spousal support beyond the date designated in the decree, and affirm.
I
When the Foremans separated after 23 years of marriage, they entered into a property settlement containing a spousal support provision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of FrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Fukuzaki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ZlatnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- In Re Marriage of ChristieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- In Re Marriage of BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997