Legal Opinion

Veenstra v. Associated Broadcasting Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1948No. Docket Nos. 70, 71, Calendar Nos. 43,704, 43,705PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

These two cases were separately begun to recover moneys paid for stock sold in violation of the Michigan blue-sky law. The pleadings are separate but the two cases were consolidated for purposes of trial and are submitted together on appeal. In the Veenstra case, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $4,236, and in the Fox case, a verdict in the sum of $6,354. Defendants moved for a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case and again at the conclusion of all testimony. The court reserved decision under the Empson act. Later, on motion of defendants, the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schrier v. B & B Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ladd v. TeichmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wade v. Chariot Trailer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Van Houtum v. Associated Broadcasting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Craig a Klapp v. United Insur Group Agency IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API