Legal Opinion

Van Houtum v. Associated Broadcasting Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1950No. Docket 61, 62, Calendar 44,559, 44,560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

These 2 cases were consolidated for purposes of trial in the superior court of Grand Rapids, and are treated as consolidated for the purposes of appeal.

Each plaintiff filed a declaration alleging purchase of stock in Associated Broadcasting Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Associated), which stock was sold plaintiffs in violation of the Michigan blue-sky law. Each suit was brought to recoyer moneys paid for the stock. From judgment for plaintiff in each case, defendants appeal.

Some of the facts recited or referred to herein were set forth in Veenstra v. Associated Broadcasting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Veenstra v. Associated Broadcasting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cleland v. SmartMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Chandler Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Nelson v. O'DELLMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Stevens v. Chandler Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API