Legal Opinion
Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1982No. 64279, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
Ziebart International Corporation notified Anthony S. Lichnovsky of its intention to terminate for cause Lichnovsky’s franchise under a license agreement with Ziebart.
Lichnovsky commenced this action and sought an injunction against the threatened termination. The trial court found that Lichnovsky had not breached the license agreement and restrained Ziebart from terminating the agreement on the basis of the evidence adduced at the hearing.
The Court of Appeals agreed that Ziebart had failed to prove a breach of the performance standards of the agreement. It said, however, that the agreement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Paisley v. LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Bonney v. CITIZENS'MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Adkisson v. OzmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Hubbard Chevrolet Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.