Ladd v. Teichman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
This is a suit in assumpsit to recover a commission plaintiff claims to be due under a contract to sell real estate for defendants. The trial court which heard the case without a jury held that the particular sale and interest sold were not within the contemplation of the contract, and entered judgment for defendants from which plaintiff appeals.
There are no important disputes as to the facts. The defendants-appellees, Teichmans, a father and son and their 2 wives, owned an unsubdivided tract of land consisting of 80 acres in Oakland county. The plaintiff-appellant, Ladd, was a licensed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bonney v. CITIZENS'MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Harris v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Bell v. DimmerlingOhio Supreme Court · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Thomas v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kruger v. SoreideNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Weitting v. McFeetersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Central Jersey Dodge Truck Center, Inc. v. Sightseer Corporation and Prf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.