Granite Gold Mining Co. v. Maginness
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Do-rado County. M. P. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
Action of ejectment to recover á mining claim situate in Smith’s Flat mining district, county of El Dorado, state of California.
Defendant S. II. Maginness answered separately and filed a cross-complaint. Plaintiff had judgment for an undivided one-half (⅞) of the demanded premises. Defendant Maginness appeals from the judgment.
Plaintiff is a mining corporation, organized under the laws of the state of California on the nineteenth day of June, 1894, and having its principal place of business at Sacramento in said state.
The objects of the corporation, as specified in its articles, are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. La RueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- McShane v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Pekin Mining & Milling Co. v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grosset v. WenaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Risdon v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Greve v. Echo Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.