Sorensen v. Maski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant sustained injuries in an automobile/motorcycle collision. The trial court jury found that appellant sustained $50,000 in damages, but found he was 72% at fault. Appellant contends the trial court erred in evidentiary rulings. We affirm.
FACTS
On June 9, 1980, at approximately 5:30 p.m., appellant Ernest Sorensen was traveling home from work on his motorcycle, proceeding westerly on Highway 12. The speed limit on that section of the road was 35 miles per hour. Appellant hit respondent’s ear as respondent was crossing Highway 12 at Budd Avenue, and appellant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Custom Farm Services, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- McNab v. JeppesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Lemieux v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- McKay's Family Dodge v. Hardrives, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re BlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Marriage of Andros v. AndrosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Molkenbur v. HartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Rowe v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.