Legal Opinion
Molkenbur v. Hart
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 1, 1987No. C6-87-43PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Leah Molkenbur appeals from the judgment and order denying her motion for new trial in a medical malpractice case in which the jury found that respondents were not negligent. We affirm.
FACTS
On December 13,1980, after taking forty 25-milligram Elavil tablets, Leah Molken-bur informed her parents that she had overdosed. They took her to the St. Croix Valley Clinic. Dr. Quinn saw Leah immediately and placed her in an examining room with her mother and father so that he and a nurse could monitor her. After consulting medical texts for recommended treatment for Elavil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Evers v. WillabyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission of Minneapolis & Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990