Legal Opinion

Dorothy Clark v. Chrysler Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 1, 2006No. 04-5279Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

436 F.3d 594

Dorothy CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-5279.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: April 22, 2005.

Decided and Filed: February 1, 2006.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Richard Hay, Law Office of Richard Hay, Somerset, Kentucky, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Thomas H. Dupree, Jr., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Washington, D.C., Lawrence A. Sutter, Sutter, O'Connell, Mannion & Farchione, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Restani; Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API