Groth v. Redmond
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
By memorandum of decision dated March 14, 1962, Judge Meyers sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ answer to defend ants’ “Plea in Abatement,” thereby, in effect, abating plaintiffs’ cause of action in this case on the ground, substantially, that there was then pending in this court another action (No. 16445) between the same parties and for the same cause as set forth in this action. This court is in complete agreement with that decision and considers what is about to be ordered here entirely consistent therewith.
The plaintiffs’ answer to plea in abatement dated April 6, 1962,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dettenborn v. Hartford-National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Redmond v. MatthiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Yardley v. Rutland Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Rode v. Adley Express Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Groth v. RedmondConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glemboski v. GlemboskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Mulder v. BayukConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Bacher v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Clarke v. Ochart, No. 68018 (Apr. 13, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Estate of Beach v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv95 0149578s (Jan. 17, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.