Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 17, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01432Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BETH BACHER et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 3:22-cv-01432 (JAM) BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND The Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) generally allows for federal jurisdiction over cases that qualify as a “mass action.” As relevant here, a “mass action” includes “any civil action … in which monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims involve common questions of law or fact.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(B)(i)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Montefiore Medical Center v. Teamsters Local 272Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Mississippi Ex Rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Geoffrey Scimone v. Carnival CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Teague v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API