Legal Opinion
Groth v. Redmond
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 14, 1962No. File 16780PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.
The parties are in agreement that at the time of the institution of the instant action by writ dated November 21, 1961, and made returnable to this court on December 5, 1961, there was then pending in the same court another action, virtually alike, between the same parties as the parties hereto and for the same cause as is set forth in the complaint in this action.
The third paragraph of the plaintiffs’ answer to the defendants’ plea in abatement, which answer has been demurred to by the defendants, declares that their prior action could fail for the reason, though this is not conceded, that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Dettenborn v. Hartford-National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Cole v. Associated Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Welles v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Groth v. RedmondConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- Dalton v. Dalton, No. Fa 95126681 (Mar. 7, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Keogh v. Von LienenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- Avon Old Farms School, Inc. v. Timber Structures, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1974
- Dalton v. Dalton, No. Fa95-126681 (Mar. 6, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.