Legal Opinion

Yardley v. Rutland Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

Arthur Yardley drove an automobile which he hired from Abe Ruskin against one of defendant’s freight cars that stood on a grade crossing of the latter’s railroad. Yardley sustained personal injuries, and the automobile was badly damaged. Each party brought an action against the defendant predicated upon its negligence; Yardley to recover for his injuries, and Ruskin to recover for the damage to his automobile. The negligence relied upon was the same in both cases, the same counsel represented the respective parties in both, they were pending in the same court, and were ripe for trial. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tazza v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Steele v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Herstein v. KemkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Richard v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API