Andrew Ansaldi Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The plaintiff, the Andrew Ansaldi Company, has filed the instant appeal from a judgment of the trial court, Noren, J., dismissing its appeal from a decision of the Manchester planning and zoning commission (commission). In ruling upon the motion to dismiss of the intervening defendants, Werner Kunzli and Arthur J. Cottier, the trial court concluded that it *68lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal because the plaintiff failed to serve a true and attested copy of the appeal upon the chairman or clerk of the commission as required by General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) § 8-28 (a), as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by40 opinions
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SalzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.