Legal Opinion
BD. OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. Spitz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 20, 1984No. 26, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
The basic question we are asked to decide in this case is whether the activities of an optician in fitting contact lenses constitute the practice of optometry and is therefore prohibited by statute in this State.
The issue arose as a result of a suit for declaratory and injunctive relief filed by the Board of Examiners in Optometry of the State of Maryland and Arthur A. Marshall, Jr., the State’s Attorney for Prince George’s County (hereinafter referred to jointly as the Board) against Richard Spitz, Jr., claiming that Spitz was engaged in the unlawful practice of optometry. The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Mauzy v. HornbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Maryland Medical Service, Inc. v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Gatewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Truitt v. Board of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Cranford v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Erwin & Shafer, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Stroh Brewery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.