Legal Opinion
Davis v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1988No. 53037PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant was charged with alternative counts of forcible rape and first degree assault. After a jury trial he was convicted of second degree assault and was sentenced by the trial court as a persistent offender to 10 years’ imprisonment. He appealed his conviction. We affirmed. State v. Davis, 689 S.W.2d 743 (Mo.App.1985).
Thereafter movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion. The court appointed counsel to represent him, and an amended motion was filed. At the evidentiary hearing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Porter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Careaga v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lytle v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Meade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Street v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Shive v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. ClayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.