Lytle v. State

FENNER, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Roger Lytle, appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 (now repealed) motion for post conviction relief. Appellant was convicted after trial by jury of two counts of selling a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.017.2(4)(j), RSMo 1978 and § 195.020.1, RSMo Supp.1984. After his conviction was upheld on appeal, State v. Lytle, 725 S.W.2d 141 (Mo.App.1987), Lytle sought post conviction relief under former Rule 27.26. His post conviction relief under Rule 27.26 was denied after hearing.

In this appeal, Lytle alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion…