Legal Opinion

Meade v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1989No. 55568PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Movant, William Meade, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted by a jury of two counts of sodomy for which he was sentenced as a persistent sexual offender to two consecutive thirty (30) year terms of imprisonment. This court affirmed the conviction on direct appeal. State v. Meade, 736 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. App., E.D.1987). In his Rule 27.26 motion, movant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, movant argues that the motion court findings and conclusions were clearly erroneous. We affirm.

Ini…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Bradford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Potts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. LightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Bland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Myszka v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API