Legal Opinion

State v. Rosario

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 4, 2002No. 2001-270PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, Lorenzo Rosario, appeals his conviction and sentence in Superior Court (Hoilman, J.) for sale of cocaine while on bail. RSA 597:14-b (2001). While he does not challenge his conviction and sentence for the underlying sale of cocaine, the defendant argues that RSA 597:14-b, a sentence enhancement statute, is not applicable to his case. He also argues that even if RSA 597:14-b does apply, it is not a separate offense, and he should have been convicted only once for the underlying sale of cocaine. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

In October 1999, the defendant, while…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. State v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. State v. HattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. State v. Rollins-ErcolinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. In re WeaverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. State v. MerriamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API