Legal Opinion

State v. Farrow

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 28, 1995No. 94-277PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Gary Farrow, is serving a life sentence without possibility of parole following his conviction for first degree murder in 1976. See State v. Farrow, 118 N.H. 296, 299, 386 A.2d 808, 810 (1978); RSA 630:1-a, III (Supp. 1977). This appeal arises from the Superior Court’s (Smukler, J.) dismissal of a petition to suspend the defendant’s sentence. We affirm.

The defendant argues that, based upon statutory rules of construction, the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling that the 1992 amendment to RSA 651:20,1(a) (Supp. 1993) (effective January 1, 1993) (amended Laws 1994,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Milford Lumber Co. v. RCB Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Bohan v. RitzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Appeal of RowanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API