Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Weaver

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 14, 2003No. 2003-153PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The petitioner, Stephen V. Weaver, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) denying him benefits for an in-state injury because he had already received benefits under Maine’s workers’ compensation statutes. We reverse and remand.

The respondent, Land Rover of Scarborough, a Maine corporation, hired Weaver to work at a new car dealership it was constructing in Bedford, New Hampshire. Throughout his entire employment, Weaver worked exclusively at the Bedford dealership.

On December 28, 2000, Weaver injured his left knee while working at the construction site.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Appeal of LalimeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. New Hampshire Retirement System v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Appeal of CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Appeal of BergeronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  5. In re BreaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Appeal of Town of SeabrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  2. Sutton v. Town of GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Appeal of Hypertherm, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Local 8027, AFT-N.H., AFL-CIO, et al., v. Frank Edelblut, Commissioner, N.H. Department of Education, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API