Legal Opinion
Strack v. Pelton
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1994No. 1993-1070PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 172.] STRACK, APPELLANT, v. PELTON, F.K.A. STRACK, APPELLEE. [Cite as Strack v. Pelton,
1994-Ohio-107.] Civil procedure—Motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B) is not timely when filed more than one year after judgment, and more than one year after the new evidence upon which it is based became admissible. (No. 93-1070—Submitted May 25, 1994—Decided August 31, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 92-A-1751. __________________ {¶ 1} On October 19, 1977, appellant, David A.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Knapp v. KnappOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Schaub, 22419 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mid-State Trust Ix v. Davis, 07-Ca-31 (4-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cleveland Municipal School Dist. v. Farson, 89525 (3-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Myers v. LawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Miller v. Susa Partnership, L.P., 07ap-702 (3-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.