Knapp v. Knapp
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
In McClain v. McClain (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 289, we held in the syllabus:
*144“A court of common pleas does not have jurisdiction to modify a provision for periodic sustenance alimony payments contained within a dissolution of marriage decree.”
McClain was decided on the basis of R.C. 3105.65(B). Today, we are called upon to decide whether the holding in McClain can be circumvented by a motion filed pursuant to Civ. R. 60(B)(4). Specifically, we must decide whether the trial court had authority, pursuant to Civ. R. 60(B)(4), to modify the alimony provision in the dissolution decree.
I
Before turning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McClain v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ashley v. AshleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by54 opinions
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Corzin v. Fordu (In Re Fordu)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Infinite Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties II, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Gilbert (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court · 2001
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.