People v. Jailles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. E. Capps, George H. P. Shaw, and Kirby & Shaw, for Appellant. IT. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Cassius Carter, District Attorney, and W. B. Andrews, Deputy District Attorney, for Bespondent.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Defendant was convicted of rape, and appeals from the judgment pronounced upon said conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the information upon the ground that “the said information charges more than one offense.’’ The demurrer was overruled, and this ruling of the trial court is complained of as erroneous.
The information contained two counts, each charging a rape committed by defendant on May 10, 1903, upon one Maria Tampo, the first charging that a rape was accomplished by means of force and violence, and against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. VannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.