Legal Opinion

Pacific National Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Wilbur

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1935No. Sac. 4917PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case, after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District. Upon further consideration, we adopt the following portion of the opinion of Mr. Justice Plummer as the opinion of this court:

“This action was begun on August 27, 1931, to recover from the defendants the sum of $7,642.94, for and on account of the alleged conversion by the respondent of 1439 head of sheep. The defendant Wilbur defaulted, and the action thereafter was prosecuted against the respondent Hazel Hoke Smith.
“The undisputed facts disclosed by the record show that on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Packard v. KingmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Copp v. MillenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. FeldsherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API