Legal Opinion
Minnesota Recipients Alliance v. Noot
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 29, 1981No. Civ. 4-81-658PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MILES W. LORD, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the defendant Noot from implementing two provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, P.L. 97-35 (hereinafter P.L. 97-35) relating to AFDC benefits. The plaintiffs claim that these two provisions conflict with state law and, therefore, by the terms of P.L. 97-35 § 2321 the federal provisions do not become effective until after the state legislature has had an opportunity to meet and consider the federal law changes. 1 The plaintiffs represent a large group of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dickenson v. PetitDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1982
- In Re MedillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Slaughter v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- DeFreitas v. NootDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1981