Legal Opinion

State v. Gorham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1935No. 5480PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

The defendant, C. Gorham, was charged with the crime of forgery, the information containing two counts: First, that he forged a bank draft in the sum of $19.50; second, that he passed the said draft as genuine, knowing the same to be false and forged.

The defendant pleaded not guilty, was duly tried on the charge, and convicted on the second count.

Defendant’s motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were by the trial court denied and sentence and judgment was pronounced; from which judgment and the order denying defendant’s motion for new trial defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Owens v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James H. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. GorhamUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Walter E. Hough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. State v. CollinsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. GorhamUtah Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API