State v. Collins
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentMaughan, Justice
For the following reasons, I dissent. Defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of forgery, Sec. 76-6-501, U.C.A. 1953, as enacted 1973.
The gravamen of the matter at hand concerns the burden of proof. Here, the signature on a negotiable instrument purports to be that of a real person, and not that of a fictitious person. The specific issue is: With subdivision (l)(b) of 76-6-501 in mind, must the state prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the person,- whose name appears on the instrument, did not authorize it to be appended there.
We should reverse. All statutory references are to U.C.A.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- State v. MayIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.