Walter E. Hough v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of passing and uttering, in connection with a purchase at a department store, a forged American Express Company money order, in violation of Title 22, D.C. Code § 1401 (1967) set forth in the margin. 1
His first contention is that, assuming the Government proved that the signatures on the money order had not been placed there by the person whose signatures they purported to be, there was a failure of proof that this person had not authorized the signatures. State v. Gorham, 87 Utah 86, 48 P.2d 447, and State v. Phillips, 256 N.C. 445, 124 S.E. 2d 146, are cited. We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. GorhamUtah Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. James H. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970