Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Gorham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1937No. 5809Published

1DissentLarson, Justice

I dissent. I think the judgment should he reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial. There are four points upon which I must disagree with my associates. I state my position on these matters as follows: (1) The trial court was in error in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the first count before any evidence was received. (2) The statement by the state’s attorney, and challenged by defendant’s counsel, was misconduct. (3) This action, on the record as made by the state, is not a forgery or violation of section 103-24-1, R. S. 1933, but, if committed, is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People of the State of New York v. . DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Jolly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Betts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API