Legal Opinion

State v. Gorham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1937No. 5809PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Justice.

Originally, the defendant, C. Gorham, was charged before the committing magistrate and by the information filed by the district attorney with the crime of forgery in two counts; the first count alleging that he forged a bank draft in words and figures as follows:

“The Continental National Bank of Salt Lake City
“Salt Lake City, Utah, Dec. 30, 1932
“At Sight Pay to the order of C. Gorham $19.50 Nineteen 50/100 Dollars
“Value Received and charge to account of with exchange.
“Sam L. Bringhurt,

Murray, Utah.

“To Continental Nat. Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah”

—by. forging and counterfeiting…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. GormachIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. StegnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SolomonUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. MorenoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. WellardUtah Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API