Legal Opinion

Smith v. Clute

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This is a suit for personal injuries. The question presented for decision is whether a statute of the State of Montana, permitting a guest to sue only for gross negligence, precludes recovery here.

The plaintiff, the defendant and their two companions, all teachers at the same school, decided to take an automobile trip to California. After discussion, the route to be traversed was agreed upon, and it was also agreed that the expenses of the operation of the car, for gasoline, oil and other incidental expenses, should be borne equally by all four. Each member of the party contributed $10.50,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Kruy v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. O'Brien v. WoldsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API