Legal Opinion

Overly v. Kass

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1989No. 1743PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELINSON, Judge:

Appellants, Suzanne L. and David M. Kass [hereinafter “Kasses”], appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, granting Appellees’, Albert and Ellen Mae Overly [hereinafter “Overlys”], Motion for Summary Judgment.

In determining whether the trial court erred in granting or denying a motion for summary judgment, this court must determine whether the “pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Rossi v. Pennsylvania State UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Cunningham v. McWilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Denlinger, Inc. v. DendlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API